<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>In The Next Version | Comments</title><description>Alan Lepofsky's blog about technology, travel and the occasional golf post.</description><link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:31:40 PM -0500</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Facebook But Were Afraid To Ask</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:31:40 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Facebook But Were Afraid To Ask</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Steve. Thank you, I'm glad you liked the post. The analysis of data is becoming a big thing for enterprise this year. I am giving a talk on Social Analytics in 2 weeks that you should attend { <a href="http://www.e2conf.com/virtual/" target="_blank" title="Link: www.e2conf.com/virtual/">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Steve. Thank you, I'm glad you liked the post. The analysis of data is becoming a big thing for enterprise this year. I am giving a talk on Social Analytics in 2 weeks that you should attend { <a href="http://www.e2conf.com/virtual/" target="_blank" title="Link: www.e2conf.com/virtual/">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/microstrategy-wisdom?opendocument&amp;comments#02022012103140PMPSC7BU.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 09:42:17 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thank you Harald, I agree the UI is a key part of the solution. I would find Twitter unusable without TweetDeck.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thank you Harald, I agree the UI is a key part of the solution. I would find Twitter unusable without TweetDeck.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02022012094217AMPSCLEY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 09:41:23 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Here are two good posts that I wanted to link to this blog post for further reading:<br /><br />- { <a href="http://blog.doubledutch.me/index.php/2011/08/an-introduction-to-work-objects/" target="_blank" title="Link: blog.doubledutch.me/index.php/2011/08/an-introduction-to-work-objects/">Link</a> }<br /><br />- { <a href="http://mikeg.typepad.com/perceptions/2011/11/introduction-organizations-today-are-faced-with-an-extreme-period-of-uncertainty-due-to-economic-geo-political-societa.html" target="_blank" title="Link: mikeg.typepad.com/perceptions/2011/11/introduction-organizations-today-are-faced-with-an-extreme-period-of-uncertainty-due-to-economic-geo-political-societa.html">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here are two good posts that I wanted to link to this blog post for further reading:<br /><br />- { <a href="http://blog.doubledutch.me/index.php/2011/08/an-introduction-to-work-objects/" target="_blank" title="Link: blog.doubledutch.me/index.php/2011/08/an-introduction-to-work-objects/">Link</a> }<br /><br />- { <a href="http://mikeg.typepad.com/perceptions/2011/11/introduction-organizations-today-are-faced-with-an-extreme-period-of-uncertainty-due-to-economic-geo-political-societa.html" target="_blank" title="Link: mikeg.typepad.com/perceptions/2011/11/introduction-organizations-today-are-faced-with-an-extreme-period-of-uncertainty-due-to-economic-geo-political-societa.html">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02022012094123AMPSCLEE.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Facebook But Were Afraid To Ask</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 05:15:15 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Facebook But Were Afraid To Ask</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Great Post, full of useful information, I sometimes feel a little overwhelmed with the terms: 'social' and business and wonder where to get started but this helps appraise what is needed to dig into business data and focus on useful social aspects as well.Thanks again.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Great Post, full of useful information, I sometimes feel a little overwhelmed with the terms: 'social' and business and wonder where to get started but this helps appraise what is needed to dig into business data and focus on useful social aspects as well.Thanks again.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/microstrategy-wisdom?opendocument&amp;comments#02022012051515PSCF84.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 04:15:29 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Harald Gaerttner</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I think filtering alone isn't the solution ... filtering may reduce the noise but the key is splitting the stream again.<br /><br />So why doing a single stream when you split it again? Because it's now YOUR choice HOW to split it. With about 600 friends (a lot of them very active) + some subscriptions on Facebook this stream is already a typical overload example if I would read it as a whole stream.<br /><br />What I did is splitting it in various lists like Social Media, IBM Notes/Domino or private stuff like Dancing, Poker, Family etc. So now I am able to look at the stream that I am especially interested in and get the information needed very fast.<br /><br />And yes, somethimes I am crossing streams ... e.g. having people from Social Media in the Notes/Domino Section or vice versa. And no the universe doesn't explode ... at least for now ;-)<br /><br />Adding filtering (no games activities for me) I now have streams that can be handled easily and suit my personal way to gather informations. And being able to do it your personal way is the great benefit. One source organised my way instead of many sources organized in ways a I may not feel comfortable with.<br /><br />Doing the same with Twitter of course.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think filtering alone isn't the solution ... filtering may reduce the noise but the key is splitting the stream again.<br /><br />So why doing a single stream when you split it again? Because it's now YOUR choice HOW to split it. With about 600 friends (a lot of them very active) + some subscriptions on Facebook this stream is already a typical overload example if I would read it as a whole stream.<br /><br />What I did is splitting it in various lists like Social Media, IBM Notes/Domino or private stuff like Dancing, Poker, Family etc. So now I am able to look at the stream that I am especially interested in and get the information needed very fast.<br /><br />And yes, somethimes I am crossing streams ... e.g. having people from Social Media in the Notes/Domino Section or vice versa. And no the universe doesn't explode ... at least for now ;-)<br /><br />Adding filtering (no games activities for me) I now have streams that can be handled easily and suit my personal way to gather informations. And being able to do it your personal way is the great benefit. One source organised my way instead of many sources organized in ways a I may not feel comfortable with.<br /><br />Doing the same with Twitter of course.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02022012041529AMPSCE2Q.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Facebook Calendar To My Calendar</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 02:28:33 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mohit sharma</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Facebook Calendar To My Calendar</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Ho lalaalaaaa]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ho lalaalaaaa]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/facebook-calendar-to-my-calendar?opendocument&amp;comments#02022012022833AMPSCBXW.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:18:16 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I should add, if the future does include filtering via auto-magical algorthyms, I hope vendors enable it so that power-users can tweak the settings. For example, it's why I like reading news via Zite on the iPad vs. Flipboard.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I should add, if the future does include filtering via auto-magical algorthyms, I hope vendors enable it so that power-users can tweak the settings. For example, it's why I like reading news via Zite on the iPad vs. Flipboard.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02012012091816PMPSC5VY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:57:28 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks Chris. I completely agree that most people don't work the way vendors assume they will, or set up their demos to emulate. Scripted scenarios are nice, but often to realistic. I'll go take a look at your post.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks Chris. I completely agree that most people don't work the way vendors assume they will, or set up their demos to emulate. Scripted scenarios are nice, but often to realistic. I'll go take a look at your post.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02012012085728PMPSC5GY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:28:07 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Chris Miller</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[You know my recent thoughts are that the current state of activity streams are a demise or productivity due to over subscription and having to constantly watch as you mention.<br /><br />Smart filtering has already shown to be a failure inside facebookc with the feedback they get on a constant basis. Also, most workers will be highly unlikely to manage their own in a reasonable format. Current users have enough trouble with rules and mal filtering to not add in a living stream.<br /><br />I wrote more here. { <a href="http://planetlotus.org/988820" target="_blank" title="Link: planetlotus.org/988820">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know my recent thoughts are that the current state of activity streams are a demise or productivity due to over subscription and having to constantly watch as you mention.<br /><br />Smart filtering has already shown to be a failure inside facebookc with the feedback they get on a constant basis. Also, most workers will be highly unlikely to manage their own in a reasonable format. Current users have enough trouble with rules and mal filtering to not add in a living stream.<br /><br />I wrote more here. { <a href="http://planetlotus.org/988820" target="_blank" title="Link: planetlotus.org/988820">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02012012082807PMPSC4WM.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 04:05:53 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Tim you make two great points: <br /><br />1) while integrating content from multiple sources removes some of the switching between applications it does cause the problem of jumbling tons of related topics together.<br /><br />2) As things scroll by they are gone. I imagine we'll soon be hearing stories of managers complaining "Why didn't you respond to the post I put into the stream for you?"]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tim you make two great points: <br /><br />1) while integrating content from multiple sources removes some of the switching between applications it does cause the problem of jumbling tons of related topics together.<br /><br />2) As things scroll by they are gone. I imagine we'll soon be hearing stories of managers complaining "Why didn't you respond to the post I put into the stream for you?"]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02012012040553PMPSCTWQ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 03:55:46 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tim Tripcony</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[As a developer, I abhor context switching. If I'm coding away, and somebody approaches me with a "quick question", the conversation might last 30 seconds, but it could take 15 minutes to fully get back into the frame of mind I was in when they arrived. I hardly get any email any more, so that's not the distraction it was in previous jobs, but when it was, I worked solely off of a local replica of my mail, with scheduled replication disabled. Similar to Andrew's point, I would choose when to think about email and choose when to think about code.<br /><br />But even within email, context switching can be jarring, because an email can theoretically be about anything. I find it difficult to compartmentalize that - to focus only on the message I'm reading, respond to it as needed, and then completely forget about it upon moving on to the next one. If I spend 5 minutes in my inbox, I'm thinking about 8 different things. They might all be important, but instead of each getting my full attention until I've dealt with it and move on to the next, by the time I'm reading the last message, my attention is diluted by everything else I've just looked at. It's particularly noticeable if some of that information is comparatively frivolous.<br /><br />That's why I miss so much that scrolls by in Facebook: my brain tunes out as I'm skimming past all of the Farmville and Mafia Wars posts, and rants about who did or didn't win some football game, on the off chance that there might actually be significant information about something happening in a friend's life... so if there is, it's likely I don't even notice, because my mind has already been Tebowed to sleep. Additionally, if I'm not diligent in checking the feed, all of the fluff has shoved anything of substance far enough down that I have to scroll for an hour to find it, so if it's been a few days since I logged in, I don't even bother reading past anything that's older than a few hours. I shudder to imagine the impact if enterprise end users had a similar experience on the job.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As a developer, I abhor context switching. If I'm coding away, and somebody approaches me with a "quick question", the conversation might last 30 seconds, but it could take 15 minutes to fully get back into the frame of mind I was in when they arrived. I hardly get any email any more, so that's not the distraction it was in previous jobs, but when it was, I worked solely off of a local replica of my mail, with scheduled replication disabled. Similar to Andrew's point, I would choose when to think about email and choose when to think about code.<br /><br />But even within email, context switching can be jarring, because an email can theoretically be about anything. I find it difficult to compartmentalize that - to focus only on the message I'm reading, respond to it as needed, and then completely forget about it upon moving on to the next one. If I spend 5 minutes in my inbox, I'm thinking about 8 different things. They might all be important, but instead of each getting my full attention until I've dealt with it and move on to the next, by the time I'm reading the last message, my attention is diluted by everything else I've just looked at. It's particularly noticeable if some of that information is comparatively frivolous.<br /><br />That's why I miss so much that scrolls by in Facebook: my brain tunes out as I'm skimming past all of the Farmville and Mafia Wars posts, and rants about who did or didn't win some football game, on the off chance that there might actually be significant information about something happening in a friend's life... so if there is, it's likely I don't even notice, because my mind has already been Tebowed to sleep. Additionally, if I'm not diligent in checking the feed, all of the fluff has shoved anything of substance far enough down that I have to scroll for an hour to find it, so if it's been a few days since I logged in, I don't even bother reading past anything that's older than a few hours. I shudder to imagine the impact if enterprise end users had a similar experience on the job.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02012012035546PMPSCTQE.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:58:10 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks Andrew. I know it's sacrilege, but I think keeping some things separate can be advantageous. Your point "I choose what to look at entirely based on what I want to see at that moment" is important. I do think software can provide some assistance in surfacing key resources in context of what you're doing, helping you discover new things. However, I don't think any algorithm can fully replace the decisions you make on your own.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks Andrew. I know it's sacrilege, but I think keeping some things separate can be advantageous. Your point "I choose what to look at entirely based on what I want to see at that moment" is important. I do think software can provide some assistance in surfacing key resources in context of what you're doing, helping you discover new things. However, I don't think any algorithm can fully replace the decisions you make on your own.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02012012025810PMPSCSLE.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:49:16 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andrew Pollack</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Don&#8217;t Cross The Streams</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Bravo, Alan!<br /><br />I have several different information sources just like most people, but I have absolutely no desire to see them all feed into a single stream. I use each source different and the best intelligence about what priority to give each feed at any given time is my own. I choose what to look at entirely based on what I want to see at that moment. It may be work related task lists, it may be friends updating their status, and it may be the latest science or gadget news. It is really not all that hard for me to select the source and go view it.<br /><br />The idea that some mechanism - no matter how good - would be aggregating, ordering, and prioritizing these makes the assumption that my desires and mood are predictable. I am not a predictable cog in a machine. I am not a number, I am a free man.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bravo, Alan!<br /><br />I have several different information sources just like most people, but I have absolutely no desire to see them all feed into a single stream. I use each source different and the best intelligence about what priority to give each feed at any given time is my own. I choose what to look at entirely based on what I want to see at that moment. It may be work related task lists, it may be friends updating their status, and it may be the latest science or gadget news. It is really not all that hard for me to select the source and go view it.<br /><br />The idea that some mechanism - no matter how good - would be aggregating, ordering, and prioritizing these makes the assumption that my desires and mood are predictable. I am not a predictable cog in a machine. I am not a number, I am a free man.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/dont-cross-the-streams?opendocument&amp;comments#02012012024916PMPSCSEU.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are We Really Better Off Without Email?</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:44:08 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Are We Really Better Off Without Email?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[David, thank you for the feedback. I should add a "Your usage patterns may vary" warning. <br /><br />Brendan, yes it's cool to blame email for all of the issues. Just like next year it will be cool to blame activity streams.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[David, thank you for the feedback. I should add a "Your usage patterns may vary" warning. <br /><br />Brendan, yes it's cool to blame email for all of the issues. Just like next year it will be cool to blame activity streams.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/are-we-really-better-off-without-email?opendocument&amp;comments#01312012084408AMPSCKAM.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are We Really Better Off Without Email?</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:19:24 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Brendan Long</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Are We Really Better Off Without Email?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Nice, and probably quite accurate despite the lack of real data. Would it be fair to say that email is a convenient scapegoat for all the cool kids who are busy ruining our productivity in other ways? :)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nice, and probably quite accurate despite the lack of real data. Would it be fair to say that email is a convenient scapegoat for all the cool kids who are busy ruining our productivity in other ways? :)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/are-we-really-better-off-without-email?opendocument&amp;comments#31012012071924PSCHMP.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are We Really Better Off Without Email?</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:17:47 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>David Hablewitz</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Are We Really Better Off Without Email?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[As long as you're using no real data, I think in 1995 I used the phone more than email. In fact, in 1995, I remember having a modem pool connected to a Notes server to connect to Notes servers at other companies to route email and replicate databases. If Tweeting falls under external social networking, that section is too small for 2012. But as long as you're using no real data, don't start now. It will only depress me more.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As long as you're using no real data, I think in 1995 I used the phone more than email. In fact, in 1995, I remember having a modem pool connected to a Notes server to connect to Notes servers at other companies to route email and replicate databases. If Tweeting falls under external social networking, that section is too small for 2012. But as long as you're using no real data, don't start now. It will only depress me more.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/are-we-really-better-off-without-email?opendocument&amp;comments#01312012021747AMPSCBR6.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>My POV On The Lotusphere 2012 Opening General Session</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:00:58 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Andrew Collinwood</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>My POV On The Lotusphere 2012 Opening General Session</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Well written composition indeed! "Notes Social Edition is limited to Connections installations" is that important composition what I was looking for a long time. Really Alan you man very informative. This composition is very important to me. Thanks for allocation.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well written composition indeed! "Notes Social Edition is limited to Connections installations" is that important composition what I was looking for a long time. Really Alan you man very informative. This composition is very important to me. Thanks for allocation.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/my-pov-on-the-lotusphere-2012-opening-general-session?opendocument&amp;comments#01312012120058AMPSC93N.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>A few comments on my site redesign</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:05:17 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wordpress portfolio themes</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>A few comments on my site redesign</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[This is imperative when it comes in business and other blogs. I am sure that administrators would be thankful because you have shared an informative article.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is imperative when it comes in business and other blogs. I am sure that administrators would be thankful because you have shared an informative article.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/a-few-comments-on-my-site-redesign?opendocument&amp;comments#01272012010517AMPSCABU.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Location. Location. Enterprise Location.</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:57:23 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Carl Tyler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Location. Location. Enterprise Location.</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Sounds like some of the things IBM wanted to achieve with Sametime's Location capabilities.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sounds like some of the things IBM wanted to achieve with Sametime's Location capabilities.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/location-location-enterprise-location?opendocument&amp;comments#01262012075723PMPSC4BE.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Predictions For 2012 From An Employee Perspective</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:10:04 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Predictions For 2012 From An Employee Perspective</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[You are, as usual in my humble opinion, spot on, Sam.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You are, as usual in my humble opinion, spot on, Sam.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.alanlepofsky.net/alepofsky/alanblog.nsf/dx/predictions-for-2012-from-an-employee-perspective?opendocument&amp;comments#01262012031004PMPSCSTU.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>

